Legal Opinion

J. C. Mahan Motor Co. v. Lyle

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

A contract was awarded Lyle by the city of Knoxville, on July 21, 1932, to furnish all labor and materials and paint a school building, under which Lyle was to be paid for the work $1,396. The contractor was required, not only to do the work properly, but to save the city harmless from the results of any negligence of the contractor, his agents or employees, and this specific provision was incorporated in the contract:

“All bills for labor, material and supplies shall be promptly paid by the contractor, and in event of failure so to do, the City may, at its election, withhold the re-tainage,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Cass v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  3. W. T. Hardison & Co. v. YeamanTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Crudgington v. HoganTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. DerrisseauxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sundberg v. Boeing Airplane Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Rowland v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  3. Coke v. CokeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  4. Grannis-Blair Audit Co. v. MadduxTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Rucker v. AymettTennessee Supreme Court · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API