Legal Opinion

Palmer v. State of Washington

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided August 29, 2019No. 3:18-cv-05262Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 Michael Palmer, CASE NO. 3:18-cv-05262-BHS- 11 Plaintiff, DWC 12 v. ORDER 13 State of Washington et al., 14 Defendants. 15 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s: (1) “Motion to Request the Appointment of Counsel” 16 (“Motion to Appoint Counsel”) (Dkt. 95) and (2) “Reply to Defendants and Cross Motion to 17 Sever on Plaintiff’s Claims Concerning Access to the Courts”. Dkt. 96. Although not 18 specifically characterized as such, the Court interprets Plaintiff’s Reply as a “Reply and a Motion 19 to Amend” as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API