Legal Opinion

Dendinger, Inc. v. Royal Indemnity Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1926No. 10.589PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.

Plaintiff, doing busi-. ness as the Madison Lumber Company, sues defendant for $300.00 on an open account.

Defendant filed a plea of prescription of three years, which was referred to the merits. On the merits the ease was decided against defendant and it has appealed.

The suit is* prescribed, on the face of the petition, because it was not brought until March 31, 1926, and the lumber, the price of which is sued for herein, was, it *303is alleged, sold and delivered October 11, 1922, more than three years before the suit was filed. But plaintiff pleads an interruption of prescription by a verbal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henry Block Co. v. PapaniaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  2. Union National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
  3. Klein v. J. D. & J. M. CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. Lackey v. MacmurdoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1854
  5. Shultz v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Sunseri v. ThomanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API