Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners v. Akins

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 20, 2001No. 84,749PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

This case involves the sufficiency of the notice given in a tax foreclosure sale. The district court refused to confirm the sale of real property located in Reno County, Kansas. The property had been purchased at the tax foreclosure auction by Charles and Terry Wall. The Board of County Commissioners of Reno County, Kansas, and the Walls appeal the trial court’s refusal to confirm the sale.

We are concerned with a fairly large parcel of valuable farmland consisting of the south two-thirds of a half section of farmland, less a 25-acre piece…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Pierce v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. Tucker v. Hugoton Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. State v. SaleemSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. PastineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. – GFTLenexa, LLC v. City of Lenexa –Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  3. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. Coleman Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  4. Board of Jefferson County Commissioners v. AdcoxCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  5. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. PastineCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API