Legal Opinion
Cooney v. Fulcomer
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 19, 1989No. 89-5327PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, an inmate at the State Correctional Institution at Graterford, Pennsylvania, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus claiming that the Pennsylvania authorities violated the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, 42 Pa.Cons.Stat. §§ 9101-9108, (IAD), when it transferred him from New Jersey to Pennsylvania to stand trial on burglary charges. The district court denied the petition. The primary issue in this appeal is whether the Pennsylvania authorities violated Article V(d) of the IAD when they tried appellant on robbery charges filed after…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Esola, 53517 v. Ronald M. Groomes, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Thomas McCandless v. Donald T. Vaughn the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania District Attorney for Philadelphia CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Leroy Thomas, A/K/A Sheeba Leroy ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Commonwealth v. BoydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Orrin Scott Reed v. Dick Clark, Superintendent, and Attorney General of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Espinoza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.