Legal Opinion
Montecino v. Louisiana
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided June 28, 1999No. Civ.A. 99-1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
FELDMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court are the plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction and the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons that follow, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The Motion for Preliminary ' Injunction is, therefore, DENIED.
Background
The plaintiffs in this case, operators of video poker machines, ask this Court to stop the State of Louisiana from implementing the results of the November 5, 1996 Local Option Election by terminating the operation of video poker in 33 Louisi ana parishes; parishes that voted “No” to video poker in the November…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Gaming Ass'n v. Riverboat GamingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Latour v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Hignell v. City of New OrleansDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024