Legal Opinion

Hoke v. Perdue

California Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1881No. 4,707PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for defendants in the Tenth District Court in and for the County of Sutter. Keyser, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Morrison, C. J.:

Plaintiff filed his complaint in the late District Court of Sutter County, against defendants, who then constituted the Board of Supervisors of that county, and prayed “ that the defendants be forever restrained and enjoined from reconstructing or repairing said levees, or any of them, or from in any manner damming up or obstructing the natural flow of waters into and through the said Butte Creek Slough, and from damming up or obstructing in any manner the natural channels through which the waters that flow into and upon said district and are drained therefrom.” We have given…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dean v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Levee District No. 1 v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morrison v. MoreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Reclamation District No. 70 v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Lorenz v. WaldronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Rockford Watch Co. v. RumpfWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Sherwood v. Worth County Drainage District Number OneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API