Legal Opinion
In re M.N.T.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 19, 2001No. Nos. 99-FS-214, 99-FS-215PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
M.N.T., who was sixteen years old at the time, was adjudged delinquent following his plea of guilty to allegations that (among other things) he assaulted two-correctional officers while confined at the Oak Hill Youth Center. At the disposition hearing, the Family Division judge permitted victim impact statements to be made orally by the two correctional officers, after which she ordered M.N.T. committed to Oak Hill for an indeterminate period not to exceed his twenty-first birthday, with release permitted only by order of the court. See D.C.Code § 16 — 2322(a)(4)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In re J.D.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- In re L.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- McClain v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Beraki v. ZerabrukeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re MNTDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001