Legal Opinion

Tews v. Husqvarna, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1986No. CO-86-352PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant Bradley Tews sued respondent Husqvarna, Inc., for damages resulting from an injury he suffered while using a chain saw manufactured by Husqvarna. The jury found that the chain saw was not unreasonably dangerous, that Tews failed to exercise reasonable care in using the saw, that he assumed the risk of his injury, and that he suffered no damages. The trial court entered judgment for Husqvar-na and denied Tews’ post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. Tews appeals from the order denying his post-trial motions. We affirm.

FACTS

In…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Holm v. Sponco Mfg., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Reinhardt v. ColtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leo PIOTROWSKI; Katherine Piotrowski, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SOUTHWORTH PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. Hassler v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Beets v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. Beets v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API