Legal Opinion

Thomas v. McCormack

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 19, 1839PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Chancery. From the Louisville Chancery Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chief Justice

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The only question to be considered in this case, is whether a conveyance of a lot in the city of Louisville by McCormack to Thomas, absolute upon its face, shall, on the facts in the record, be deemed nevertheless a mortgage, as alleged in the bill, and peremptorily denied in the answer.

There being no written memorial of any condition or defeasance, neither the public interest nor the established principles of equitable jurisprudence will allow a court *109of either equity or law to admit parol testimony, in opposition to the legal import of the…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Russell v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Towner v. Lucas' ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1857
  3. Fairchild v. RasdallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Scott v. SpurrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Rogan v. WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API