Legal Opinion

United States v. Horrell

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 9, 2012No. Nos. 11-3846, 12-1205Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

After the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines were amended retroactively to further reduce the sentencing ranges for offenses involving crack cocaine, pursuant to the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, P.L. 111— 220, 124 Stat. 2372 (Aug. 3, 2010), see U.S.S.G. Supp. to App. C, Vol. III 374-385, 391-98 (2011) Amendments 748, 750 & 759, Tyler M. Horrell filed a motion pro se asking the district court to reduce his sentence. Based on prior revisions to the Guidelines, the court had already reduced Horrell’s sentence from the original prison term of 293 months we affirmed in Horrell’s first appeal, see…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. United States v. AliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API