Legal Opinion

Campau v. Dubois

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1878PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Superior Court of Detroit. Ejectment. Defendants, bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

This is an action of ejectment. Plaintiffs in error, who were defendants below, are in possession of lot 94, section 1, of the Governor and Judges’ Plan of Detroit, being a city lot on Congress street, bordering on and partly including the bed of an old water course known as the river Savoyard. The lot came to Daniel J. Campau, on partition of the estate of his father, Joseph Campau, who died in 1863. Plaintiffs below set up title as heirs at law of Barnabas Campau and Jacques Campau, brothers of Joseph Campau, whom they claim to have been tenants in common, holding each an undivided sixth of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Willison v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Jackson Ex Dem. Bradstreet v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  3. Clapp v. BromaghamCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1827
  4. Wright v. . SaddlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  5. Dubois v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Elder v. McClaskeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  2. City of Rock Springs v. SturmWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Flesher v. CallahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Fuller v. SwensbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Same v. SameNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API