Legal Opinion

Guajardo v. Conwell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2001No. 00-1234PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Per curiam

The court of appeals dismissed this appeal as not having been timely perfected. 30 S.W.3d 15 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000). We agree that dismissal was appropriate but for a different reason, which is that the trial court did not render a final, appealable judgment.

Clarissa Guajardo, an attorney, sued Tracey Conwell, another attorney, and Creole Construction Company, and the parties reached a mediated settlement agreement. Before the case could be resolved, however, defendants filed a counterclaim against Guajardo for breach of the settlement agreement. Guajardo’s attorney, Wayne…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Guajardo v. ConwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Alaniz v. Hoyt, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  2. Garcia v. Commissioners Court of Cameron County, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  3. Parks v. DeWitt County Electric Cooperative, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  4. Lopez v. Sulak, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  5. Black v. ShorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API