Legal Opinion

Baker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 27, 1984No. AV-455PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

448 So.2d 36 (1984)

James R. BAKER, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. AV-455.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 27, 1984.

Appellant pro se.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and T. Edward Austin, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

2Per curiam

The trial court's order of 19 October 1983, denying appellant's Rule 3.850 motion dated 27 July 1983, is affirmed. The Rule 3.850 motion is not in substantial compliance with the provisions of the Rule in that it is not under oath and fails to contain the information required by paragraphs (b) and (c) of the Rule. See Catlett v. State, 367 So.2d…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Catlett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Jarvis v. JarvisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rowe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Long v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Cherry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. McWilliams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API