Legal Opinion

McWilliams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 24, 1985No. 85-575PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court did not err in summarily denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. Appellant’s motion was facially insufficient because appellant failed to make the motion under oath and state whether he had taken an appeal as required under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Baker v. State, 448 So.2d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

However, we cannot consider the correctness of the judge’s ruling which found that appellant was entitled to eighty days of jail credit time because the judge failed to attach a copy of the portion of the record which conclusively shows appellant is not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Ross v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API