Legal Opinion
Ramsey v. Rosenthal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 7, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.
This is a representative action brought by plaintiff to compel the defendants to account for their acts as directors and liquidating trustees of the Chandler-Cleveland Motors Corporation. The defendant Rosenthal moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject of the suit and that the complaint fails to state a good cause of action. The complaint was dismissed on both grounds.
The complaint sets out that by a series of stock transfers the Hupp Motor Car Corporation, a Virginia corporation, became the owner of most of the shares of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miller v. . QuincyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Holmes v. CampAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Hamm v. Christian Herald Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Major v. American Malt & Grain Co.New York Supreme Court · 1920
- Howe v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Wagner v. BraunsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Sterling v. Seeman Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947