Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Braunsberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFpaNK, J.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the complaint upon the ground of forum non conveniens.

The complaint alleges, and it is not disputed, that the plaintiff is a resident of the State of New York, and the defendant of London, England. Mr. Braunsberg, the defendant, was served with process while in New York City.

The pleading alleges that Rosie Girvan and Anthony J. Girvan duly assigned all their right, title and interest in a certain contract to the plaintiff. The contract, a copy of which is annexed to the complaint, was entered into by the assignors with the defendant and four…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Gregonis v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Travis v. . Knox Terpezone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Bata v. BataNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Langfelder v. Universal Laboratories, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1944

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thomson v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Viacom International Inc. v. Tandem Productions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  3. Bechtel Corp. v. Industrial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. CRAFT EM CLO 2006-1, Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank AGAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. Fuss v. French National RailroadsNew York Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API