Legal Opinion

Kohoutek v. Hafner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 14, 1986No. C6-84-1274PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

Defendants in a medical malpractice suit seek further review of a decision of the Minnesota Court of Appeals. The defendants were found not to be liable after a trial in the Wilkin County District Court. The court of appeals reversed and granted a new trial on the issues of battery and negligent nondisclosure. We now reverse the court of appeals and reinstate the judgment of the district court.

In early 1982, Barbara Kohoutek became pregnant with her first child. For her prenatal care, Kohoutek consulted Dr. W.H. Wall, a physician practicing medicine in Wahpeton, North Dakota.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Bang v. Charles T. Miller HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hondroulis v. SchuhmacherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. K.A.C. v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Sherwood v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Turek v. Saint Elizabeth Community Health CenterNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API