Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Cupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 13, 1971PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*394SCHWAB, C.J.

The petitioner, Thompson, petitioned the circuit court for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that he was illegally imprisoned in that the Oregon State Board of Parole and Probation had arbitrarily and capriciously revoked his parole. On appeal from judgment dismissing the writ he contends that the board’s action was arbitrary and capricious, because (1) it failed to grant him a hearing with counsel prior to its order of revocation, and (2) there was no credible evidence that he had violated the conditions of parole.

* * [A] parolee has no constitutional right to a hearing or counsel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. Gilmore v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  3. State Ex Rel. Gilmore v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  4. Whalen v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burns v. NewellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. Brom v. NewellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. Adams v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. Thompson v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API