Legal Opinion

Burns v. Newell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 12, 1973PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

Petitioner brought this habeas corpus proceedings contending he had been arbitrarily and capriciously denied “good time” credits on the sentence he was serving. Defendants are the members of the Board, of Parole and Probation and the Superintendent of theOregon State Penitentiary. The circuit court ruled in petitioner’s favor, computed what it believed to be the proper. amount of good time credit, determined petitioner had completed service of his sentence based on its computations, and ordered his release from custody. Defendants appeal. We reverse.

In certain circumstances, Oregon prisoners…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Fredericks v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State Ex Rel. Gilmore v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  4. State Ex Rel. Gilmore v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  5. Fredericks v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alexander Hebrard v. Jeremy NofzigerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  2. Sterling v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Shelby v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Brom v. NewellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. Anderson v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API