Legal Opinion

Koelsch v. Girard

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1934No. 6149PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted by the present incumbents of the offices of district judges of the third judicial district of the state of Idaho against the defendant, Secretary of State, to compel the latter to accept and' file nonpartisan declarations of candidacy by plaintiffs to succeed themselves. The petition on which an alternative writ has issued sets forth the duties of the Secretary of State to file nonpartisan declarations of candidacy for the offices of district judge and of certifying the names of candidates to the auditors of the counties in each judicial district as provided in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Idaho Power & Light Co. v. BlomquistIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Kenneweg v. County Commissioners of Allegany CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  3. Peavy v. McCombsIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Ledgerwood v. PittsTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Adams v. LansdonIdaho Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Boughton v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Engelking v. Investment BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Eberle v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Caesar v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Idaho Telephone Company v. BairdIdaho Supreme Court · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API