Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Hawkins.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1864PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Seventeenth Judicial District, Sierra County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Cobbey, J.

The complaint in this case is in equity, to redeem certain property in Sierra County from the lien of a mortgage executed on the 13th day of May, 1856, by one James H. Bartlett, to the firm of Raskt & Co., of which the defendant was a member, to secure the payment of a debt then due said firm from said Bartlett, and also for an account of the issues and profits of the premises received by the defendant during the time he had the possession of the premises, which was from the date of the mortgage.

The instrument denominated a mortgage purports to be a conveyance from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zeller's Lessee v. EckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. Lord v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Koch v. BriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. McCarthy v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Johnson v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Arrington v. LiscomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Allen v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Green v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  4. Adams v. HoldenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. Wright v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API