Legal Opinion · Dissent

McClain v. Begley

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 22, 1990No. C1-89-2206Published

1DissentNorton, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The majority misconstrues Anderson, Budget and the trial court’s ruling in this case to reach its result.

The trial court in this case did not ‘construe the No-fault Act to impose liability on a self-insurer up to its self-insured retention.’ The trial court specifically stated, “This is not a case of the court imposing liability.” It added “Altea has conceded that if it is liable as owner (as opposed to vicariously liable for its driver) we’d have significant coverage available.” In fact, the fundamental source of Altra’s liability in this case is because it was the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Beukhof v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Crews v. Criterion Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API