Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 25, 1989No. C8-89-369PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
The trial court ruled that self-insured respondent Northwestern Bell Telephone Company (Bell) provided $25,000 of under-insured motorist (UIM) insurance and that because appellant Raymond W. Anderson (Anderson) was driving a car owned by Bell when he was injured, recovery was not possible from his personal insurer, respondent North River Insurance Company (North River). Appellants Raymond W. and Barbara Anderson argue that Bell, as primary insurer, provided UIM coverage of one million dollars and that North River is liable for secondary UIM coverage. We affirm in part…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Northern Petrochemical Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Broton v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Sawyer v. Midland Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hendricks v. CURATORS OF UNIV. OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Hoffman v. Yellow Cab Co. of LouisvilleKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- McCoy v. SOUTH CENT. BELL TELEPHONE CO.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Willis v. SwainHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.