Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Riley

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided June 29, 2001No. 00-5003/AF & 98-0146/AFPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSullivan, Judge

Appellant was charged with the premeditated murder of her baby (Article 118(1), UCMJ, 10 USC § 918(1)), but the members found her guilty of the unpremeditated murder of this newborn. Article 118(2), UCMJ. The Court of Criminal Appeals, in its first decision in this case, set aside appellant’s conviction for unpremeditated murder based on the factual insufficiency of the evidence of her intent to kill. 47 MJ 603 (1997). It affirmed a conviction of a lesser offense of involuntary manslaughter, in violation of Article 119, UCMJ, 10 USC § 919, based on her culpably negligent conduct in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  2. United States v. StandiferUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. RileyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  4. United States v. RileyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API