Legal Opinion

Ireland v. Tomahawk Light, Telephone & Improvement Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed October 14, 1924:

Vinje, C. J.

The defendant raises a question of pleading, but since every claim made by it was fully litigated upon the trial it is now academic. It filed a counterclaim in the action and the plaintiff filed a reply. Defendant entered a general demurrer to the reply. Plaintiff claims the counterclaim did not state a cause of action, and the court so held. It is the claim of the defendant that its demurrer to the reply did not reach back to test the correctness of the counterclaim. It is an elementary principle that a demurrer to a pleading…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Calumet Service Co. v. City of ChiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Monroe Water Works Co. v. City of MonroeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. State ex rel. Milwaukee Street Railway Co. v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Fond du Lac Water Co. v. City of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Waters v. MarkhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Stephens v. WheelerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Glaser v. ShostackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  4. Nickoll v. Racine Cloak & Suit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Frier v. TerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API