Legal Opinion

Saas v. Major, Lindsey & Africa, LLC

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 10, 2024No. 1:23-cv-02102Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND HEIDI SAAS, Plaintiff, v. Civil No.: 1:23-cv-02102-JRR MAJOR, LINDSEY & AFRICA, LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the court is Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Complaint, or, in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6; the “Motion”). The court has reviewed all papers, and no hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md. 2023). For the reasons that follow, by accompanying order, the Motion (ECF No. 6), construed as a motion to dismiss, will be granted. I. BACKGROUND This action arises from…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API