Legal Opinion

County of Stanislaus v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 5, 2015No. CIV. NO. 1:14-00666 WBS SMSPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE; CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This action seeks to resolve disputes regarding the coverage due under a comprehensive general liability policy issued to plaintiff County of Stanislaus by the Insurance Company of the Pacific Coast, which was a former entity of defendant Travelers Indemnity Company. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, both parties move for summary judgment to' resolve defendant’s obligations under the policy,

I. Factual and Procedural Background

From 1970 until 1990, plaintiff operated the Greer…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Giles v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rli Ins. Co. v. City of VisaliaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  2. Chaudhry v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API