Legal Opinion
Dumm v. Pacific Valves
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 14, 1956No. Civ. 21854PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment and attempt to appeal from an “order hereinbefore made on or about the 10th day of October, 1955, sustaining the defendants’ demurrer to plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint herein.”
An order sustaining a demurrer is not appealable. (Code Civ. Proc, § 963; Jeffers v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 107 Cal.App.2d 253, 254 [237 P.2d 51].) It is deemed excepted to (Code Civ. Proc., § 647) and will be reviewed upon appeal from the judgment. The minute order of October 10, 1955, is that the demurrer of all of the named defendants to the Third Amended Complaint “is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Sutter v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Stowe v. Fritzie Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Moxley v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Otworth v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Gonzales v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Hagan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Smith v. Kern County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.