Legal Opinion

Wade v. McKeown

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 2, 1943No. 30754PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The effect, if any, which a trust created by Clarence Wade for his sole benefit had upon his right to sell and convey an undivided one-twelfth interest in the minerals under a tract of land containing 139.7 acres, situated in Pontotoc county, is the controlling issue which this appeal presents for determination.

The tract of land involved was originally allotted to George Wade, Sr., who departed this life testate and whose last will devised said lands to his widow, Minnie Wade, and to his sons, George Wade, Jr., and Clarence Wade.in equal shares. On November 4, 1933, Clarence Wade took unto…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Johnson v. RoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Dunnett v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Coryell v. MarrsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Odle v. BaskinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bixby v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Merchants National Bank of Mobile v. CowleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Starnes v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Bixby v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API