Legal Opinion

Dhanaraj v. Markel Insurance Company

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 21, 2021No. 8:20-cv-00970Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CHRISTINA DHANARAJ, et al., * Plaintiffs, * Case No. TJS-20-0970 v. * MARKEL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., * Defendants. * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION Now pending before the Court is Defendant Markel Insurance Company’s (“Markel”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 45).1 Having considered the submissions of the parties (ECF Nos. 45, 46 & 47), I find that a hearing is unnecessary. See Loc. R. 105.6. For the following reasons, Markel’s motion will be granted. I. Background Plaintiff Christina Dhanaraj (“Dhanaraj”) filed…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. PryseskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Kay Butler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API