Legal Opinion
Amador County, Cal. v. Salazar
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 6, 2011No. 10-5240PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
Pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, the Buena Vista Ranchería of Me-Wuk Indians entered into a compact with the state of California to engage in gaming on its tribal land and then petitioned the Secretary of the Interior for approval of that compact. Under the Act, “[i]f the Secretary does not approve or disapprove a compact ... [within] 45 days ... the compact shall be considered to have been approved by the Secretary, but only to the extent the compact is consistent with the provisions of’ the Act. 25 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Netcoalition v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Connecticut v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bear Valley Mutual Water Co. v. Kenneth SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Menominee Indian Tribe of Wis v. EPACourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.