Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1905No. L.A. No. 1338PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This action is brought to recover damages for the death of Katherine S. Johnson, wife of the plaintiff Prank W. Johnson, and mother of the other plaintiffs, who are minors, alleged to have been occasioned through the negligence of defendant.

The second amended complaint, after stating the corporate . existence of defendant, and the maintenance and operation by it of a railroad on July 25, 1901, alleges, as the facts upon which the cause of action for negligence is predicated, that, said railroad “about five miles west of the city of Santa Barbara crosses obliquely the county road known as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The People v. . the New-York Central Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1855
  2. People v. New York Central Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Rupard v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  4. Jenson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Johnson v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Valente v. Sierra Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Miller ex rel. Carpenter v. EngleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API