Legal Opinion
Amerada Hess Corporation v. Department of Interior
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 25, 1999No. 97-5223PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
In this case, we are asked primarily to determine whether reimbursements for certain production-related costs, received by a federal gas lessee from its gas purchasers under an administrative order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”), are properly subjected to federal royalties by the Secretary of the Interior (“Secretary”) under the authority of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (“OCSLA”), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1331-1356. We are also required to resolve whether the Secretary’s claims may be offset by the lessee’s own. claims for reimbursement from the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Maryland Department of Human Resources v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Amoco Prodn Co v. Watson, Rebecca W.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- City & County of San Francisco v. U.S. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Oxy USA, Inc. v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Amoco Production Co. v. BacaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- OXY USA v. DOICourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.