Legal Opinion
Oxy USA, Inc. v. Babbitt
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 23, 2000No. Nos. 98-5222, 98-5252 and 99-5098PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Through the Department of the Interior (“DOI”), Shell Oil Company (“Shell”)' and OXY USA, Inc. (“OXY”) obtained a number of oil and gas leases in California. In late 1996, the Minerals Management Service (“MMS”), a bureau of the DOI, issued orders requiring Shell and OXY to pay additional royalties and interest on oil produced between 1980 and 1988. Shell and OXY challenged the orders in federal district court. Among other things, Shell and OXY asserted that the orders were barred by the six-year statute of limitation set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2415(a). The district court…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- OXY USA, Inc. v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Lujan-Jimenez v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Amoco Production Co. v. BacaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.