Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ngow

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1995PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether a baseball bat which has not been specially made or adapted for criminal use, can be an instrument of crime as defined by 18 Pa.C.S. § 907(c)(2).

Ngow was convicted of aggravated and simple assault, indecent assault, recklessly endangering another person, possessing an instrument of crime and criminal conspiracy. ’ He was sentenced to concurrent terms of eight to twenty-three months on all charges except the instrument of crime charge, on which he was sentenced consecutively to one year probation, 16 Pa.D. & C.4th 598.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SenyszynSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. NgowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CastroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. RobertsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. MaglioccoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. MaglioccoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. VidaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API