Commonwealth v. Ngow
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether a baseball bat which has not been specially made or adapted for criminal use, can be an instrument of crime as defined by 18 Pa.C.S. § 907(c)(2).
Ngow was convicted of aggravated and simple assault, indecent assault, recklessly endangering another person, possessing an instrument of crime and criminal conspiracy. ’ He was sentenced to concurrent terms of eight to twenty-three months on all charges except the instrument of crime charge, on which he was sentenced consecutively to one year probation, 16 Pa.D. & C.4th 598.
The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SenyszynSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. NgowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CastroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. RobertsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. MaglioccoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. MaglioccoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. VidaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.