Zogoplos v. Brown
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
I. The first exception is without merit. Glines v. Smith, 48 N. H. 259, 273; Ordway v. Haynes, 50 N. H. 159, 165; Hoxie v. Walker, 75 N. H. 308, 313. If the objection to the form of the question as leading had been made when it was asked, it would be here considered only on the point whether the trial court had abused its discretion in admitting it in such form. Severance v. Carr, 43 N. H. 65; Wells v. Company, 48 N. H. 491, 540; Gerrish v. Gerrish, 63 N. H. 128.
II. The plaintiff testified that he saw the accident happen. In a deposition he gave testimony which may fairly be construed as a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hobbs v. George W. Blanchard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
- Whitman v. MoreySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
- Lydston v. Rockingham County Light & Tower Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
- Hoxie v. WalkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
- Parker v. New BostonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GomesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Raymond v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
- State v. GomesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- State v. GomesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976