Legal Opinion

State v. Gomes

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 27, 1976No. 7291Published

1Opinion of the Court

116 N.H. 113 (1976)

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

v.

RONALD F. GOMES

No. 7291.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

February 27, 1976.

Warren B. Rudman, attorney general, Gregory H. Smith, assistant attorney general, and Richard B. McNamara, attorney appearing pursuant to Rule 23 (Mr. Smith orally), for the State.

Joseph J. Balliro (of Massachusetts), by brief and orally, for the defendant.

GRIMES, J.

The issue presented in this case is whether an extrajudicial statement of a witness, written but not sworn to, which incorporates admissions of the defendant, is admissible as substantive evidence of the matters…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ruhala v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Caswell v. Maplewood GarageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
  3. State v. GomesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  4. State v. ChickeringSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1952
  5. State v. HersomSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API