Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Enzo Biochem, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 22, 2012No. Nos. 06 Civ. 170(SAS), 06 Civ. 213(SAS), 06 Civ. 6347(SAS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Dan Brecher, former counsel for plaintiff Paul Lewicki, brings this motion for an Order pursuant to Rule 71 directing non-party Lawrence Glaser to return confidential documents. On October 12, following an evidentiary hearing at which Brecher and Lewicki — but not Glaser — were present and testified, I granted a motion for sanctions brought by defendants Enzo Bio-chem, Inc., Heiman Gross, Barry Weiner, Elazar Rabbani, Sharim Rabbani, John Delucca, Dean Engelhardt, and John Does *3401-50 (the “Enzo Defendants”);1 I found both…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aydemir v. GarlandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Floyd v. The City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- LeClair v. VinsonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
- Russell v. Westchester Community CollegeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. GPB Capital Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023