Legal Opinion
Blakeslee v. Ervin
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1894No. 5349PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error from the district court of Dawson county. Tried below before Gaslin, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This action was commenced by defendants in error in the county court of Dawson county, Nebraska, where they filed the following petition:
“The plaintiffs complain of the defendant and allege that they are partners doing business under the firm name of Ervin & Hammond, and are engaged in the sale of real estate and other property on commission in Dawson county, Nebraska; that on the 10th day of May, 1890, the defendant, being the owner of certain shares of stock in the Dawson County National Bank, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the United States, applied to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Middleton v. FindlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- City of Lincoln v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Rees v. SpruanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Anderson v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- Butler v. KennardNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maxson v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Stein v. VanniceNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Dowell v. PumphreyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922