Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 2, 1988No. D86-2285; CA A46034PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Husband appeals an order denying his motion to set aside a judgment of dissolution. ORS 19.010(2)(c). We reverse.

The court signed an order of default and a judgment based on that default on the same day. At the time the order of default and the judgment were made, July 9, 1987, ORCP 69B(2) provided, in relevant part:

“If the party against whom judgment by default is sought has appeared in the action or if the party seeking judgment has received notice that the party against whom judgment is sought is represented by an attorney in the pending proceeding, the party against whom judgment is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Denkers v. Durham Leasing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Goldmark v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of MannixCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API