Legal Opinion

Goldmark v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 11, 1987No. 16-84-00716; CA A31983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendants1 appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to set aside a default judgment against them. We reverse and remand.. Plaintiff filed its complaint in late January or early February, 1984. Defendants’ attorney accepted service. On March 14, 1984, plaintiffs attorney mailed a letter, bearing that date, to defendants’ attorney. It stated, in part:

“Please see that an Answer is filed in the above captioned case at your earliest convenience. PURSUANT TO THE NOTICE REQUIRED BY OREGON RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, I WILL SEEK AN ORDER OF DEFAULT AND JUDGMENT ON THURSDAY, MARCH 29,1984.
“I…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morrow County School District 1 v. Oregon Land & Water Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Denkers v. Durham Leasing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kilgore v. Protran Transmission, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. In re the Marriage of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. B & R Equipment Sales, Inc. v. CommonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API