Legal Opinion
Goldmark v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 11, 1987No. 16-84-00716; CA A31983PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Defendants1 appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to set aside a default judgment against them. We reverse and remand.. Plaintiff filed its complaint in late January or early February, 1984. Defendants’ attorney accepted service. On March 14, 1984, plaintiffs attorney mailed a letter, bearing that date, to defendants’ attorney. It stated, in part:
“Please see that an Answer is filed in the above captioned case at your earliest convenience. PURSUANT TO THE NOTICE REQUIRED BY OREGON RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, I WILL SEEK AN ORDER OF DEFAULT AND JUDGMENT ON THURSDAY, MARCH 29,1984.
“I…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Morrow County School District 1 v. Oregon Land & Water Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Denkers v. Durham Leasing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kilgore v. Protran Transmission, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- In re the Marriage of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- B & R Equipment Sales, Inc. v. CommonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988