Legal Opinion
U-Haul Co. of Arizona v. Saban (In Re Saban)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 7, 1983No. BAP No. AZ-82-1269 EAsH, Bankruptcy No. 82-0334-PHX-VDM, Adv. No. 82-254-VDMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ELLIOTT, Bankruptcy Judge:
Ned Saban (“Saban”) is a U-Haul rental agent who operates two rental facilities in Phoenix, Arizona. Saban and his wife, Loretta Livingston Saban, (collectively “the Sa-bans”) are joint chapter 11 debtors under Title 11 United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). They appeal from summary judgment in favor of U-Haul of Arizona (“U-Haul”) holding that Saban breached his contract and enforcing against Saban a covenant not to compete.
The issues before this panel are whether, on U-Haul’s motion for summary judgment, the trial court properly determined that Saban…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- S. A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines) v. Walter Kidde & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Samuel G. Bialac, Debtor. Samuel G. Bialac v. Harsh Investment Corporation and Harsh Building Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- U-Haul Co. of Central Illinois v. HindahlAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Central Alarm of Tucson v. GanemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Prin Corp. v. Altman (In Re Altman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2001