Legal Opinion
Serodio v. Rutgers
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 13, 2014No. Civil Action No. 09-2221 (SRC)PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHESLER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (fik/a University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (“UMDNJ”))1 and the various individual Defendants,2 who are affiliated with UMDNJ. Plaintiff Paulo Serodio (“Plaintiff’ or “Serodio”) has opposed the motion. The Court has considered the papers filed by the parties. It rules based on the written submissions and without oral argument, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For the reasons expressed below, the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- ABDULLAH v. ROWAN UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- ABDUR-RAHEEM v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- ABDUR-RAHEEM v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- ALTAGRACIA v. VIOLADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- ARMSTRONG v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.