Legal Opinion

Bell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 24, 1922No. 3898PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Circuit Judge.

The information in the above-stated case contained two counts. The first charged the plaintiff in error, Bell, with a violation of the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305), in transporting 15 gallons of intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes from Mt. Pleasant, Tex., to the Con Henderson farm, in Tarrant county. The second count charged him. with unlawfully having in his possession 15 gallons of whisky for beverage purposes, in violation of said act. Each count charged that said liquor did not come within any of the exceptions or exemptions of said act of Congress…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Massey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
  2. McBride v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
  3. Lambert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hoyer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Garske v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  3. Olmstead v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  4. Singer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
  5. Agnello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API