Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. Sutherland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 29, 2002No. 1001327 and 1001458PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The City of Birmingham (hereinafter referred to as "the City") appeals the trial court's denial of its preverdict and postverdict motions for judgments as a matter of law as to certain claims that had been asserted against it by John Charles Sutherland. Sutherland cross-appeals the trial court's judgment as a matter of law in favor of the City on other claims that he asserted. We reverse and remand as to the City's appeal and affirm as to Sutherland's cross-appeal. On December 22, 1998, Sutherland sued the City, seeking to recover damages on claims of false imprisonment, "public ridicule" and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Barnes v. DaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Hollis v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Ex Parte City of TuskegeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SmithermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Hunt Petroleum Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API