Legal Opinion
Nowicki v. Planning & Zoning Board
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 20, 1961PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBordos, J.
The plaintiffs are the owners of property in Milford in the vicinity of Orange Avenue. They filed protests against changing the zone classification, from R-30 to R-18, of property owned by the defendants Harold and Jeannette Woodruff. The planning and zoning board of Milford, in this instance acting as a zoning hoard, granted the Woodruffs’ petition, and the plaintiffs appealed to the Court of Common Pleas. The trial court sustained their appeal, and from this judgment the Woodruffs, hereinafter called the defendants, have appealed.
Zoning in Milford exists under what is now §§ 8-1 to 8-13 of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strain v. MimsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Kutcher v. Town Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Tyler v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Kuehne v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Mallory v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Morningside Assn. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Metropolitan Homes, Inc. v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Zygmont v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Damick v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.