Legal Opinion

Tlusty v. Gillespie-Rogers-Pyatt Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 6, 1940No. Civil No. 1221PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is an action for personal injuries due to the alleged negligence of the defendant.

The complaint alleges diversity of citizenship and that the amount in controversy exceeds, exclusive of interest and costs, the sum of $3,000. The answer admitted the third paragraph of the complaint which reads as follows: “Third: That the amount in controversy herein exceeds, exclusive of interest and costs, the sum of $3,000.” Upon the trial the Court permitted the answer to be amended by denying this paragraph of the complaint.

Regardless of the admission or denial the Court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holt v. Indiana Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Davis v. MillsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1900
  3. Wilderman v. RothDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Pepper v. RogersU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lorraine Motors, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1958
  2. Mabry v. Government Employee's Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2017
  3. Scott v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API