Legal Opinion

Pepper v. Rogers

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided March 1, 1904No. 1,789PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

This is a motion to remand a case removed from the state court. All the elements authorizing removal are conceded to exist, except with reference to the citizenship of the parties to the controversy. The plaintiff sues as a receiver of a corporation, constituted as such by this court. He is a citizen of the state of. Pennsylvania. The defendant, who removed the case from the state court, is a citizen of the state of New York; and whatever other parties there are to the suit, if any, are citizens of other states than Massachusetts. The plaintiff, simultaneously with the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Gableman v. Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Mexican National Railroad v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Guarantee Co. of North America v. Mechanics' Sav. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. Memphis Sav. Bank v. HouchensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Permutit Co. v. Harvey Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  2. Manufacturers' Commercial Co. v. Brown Alaska Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1906
  3. Tlusty v. Gillespie-Rogers-Pyatt Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1940
  4. Barnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Barnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API