Griffin v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Dissent
*178SPEAR, Justice
(dissenting) :
The majority apparently concedes that “Griffin was totally and permanently disabled from continuing in his former employment." Yet despite this “permanent disability,” the majority would still limit the Board’s none-too-generous 75% award to an award of 50% partial permanent disability. With this conclusion I cannot agree. If claimant is permanently disabled, he is entitled to 100% permanent disability compensation, not to 50 or 75 percent permanent partial disability compensation.
As Professor Larson has stated in his treatise on Workmen’s Compensation:
“The total…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McNeil v. Panhandle Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Smith v. University of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
- Kiger v. Idaho CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Kelley v. ProutyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.